Team Split Assessment
Plan Under Review
Section titled “Plan Under Review”- File:
ux-design/components/plan/goal.md - Date: 2026-03-24
Complexity Analysis
Section titled “Complexity Analysis”| Factor | Value | Threshold | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total tasks | ~30 (13 items in Wave 0b + 15 components + barrel/integration) | 15 | Over |
| Sequential phases with dependencies | 6 (0a, 0b, 1, 2, 3, 4) | 2 | Over |
| Distinct persona types | 2 (front-end-engineer, quality-reviewer) | 4 | Under |
| Working directories | 1 (ux-prototype) | 1 | At threshold |
| Cross-cutting concerns | 2 (barrel exports, design token consistency) | 1 | Over |
| Tasks with external validation | 6 (wave gates: lint + build + test) | 5 | Over |
Qualitative factors:
- Context window pressure: High — 19 components with detailed props interfaces, test specs, and story specs will exhaust context if tracked by a single team lead.
- Error blast radius: Moderate — Wave 0b structural changes (file moves, import updates) affect all subsequent waves. Isolating them limits risk.
- Natural phase boundaries: Clear — each wave has an explicit gate (lint + build + tests pass).
Recommendation
Section titled “Recommendation”Split — The project exceeds thresholds on 4 of 6 factors and has clear natural phase boundaries at each wave gate. Context window pressure from tracking 19 component implementations argues for splitting into runs that can be executed with fresh context.
Proposed Runs
Section titled “Proposed Runs”| Run | Directory | Description | Tasks | Personas | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | run-1-infrastructure/ | Wave 0a + 0b: deps, scaffolding, primitives, types, mocks, primitive stories | ~16 | front-end-engineer | Structural changes, no new components |
| 2 | run-2-foundation/ | Wave 1: foundation components (utilities, Badge, Avatar, CopyrightAcknowledgment, ImageDisplay, ImageDropZone, ImagePreviewEditor) | ~8 | front-end-engineer | Leaf components, parallelizable |
| 3 | run-3-composition/ | Wave 2: composition components (ImageHoverPreview, ImageInspectorOverlay, ImageComparisonLayout, ImageFormField) | ~4 | front-end-engineer | Depend on Wave 1 outputs |
| 4 | run-4-grid-organism/ | Wave 3 + 4: grid atoms, ImageUploadDialog, item-grid-columns integration, barrel exports | ~6 | front-end-engineer | Most complex components, integration |
Artifact Flow
Section titled “Artifact Flow”Run 1 produces: - utilities/ directory with types, getInitials, getCroppedImage - ShadCN primitives (alert-dialog, checkbox, popover, progress, slider, aspect-ratio) - Badge error-overlay variant - Mock data module - Primitive context stories
Run 2 consumes Run 1 outputs, produces: - ImageDisplay, ImageDropZone, ImagePreviewEditor molecules - CopyrightAcknowledgment atom - Avatar refactor (getInitials import) - Badge stories update
Run 3 consumes Run 2 outputs, produces: - ImageHoverPreview, ImageInspectorOverlay, ImageComparisonLayout, ImageFormField
Run 4 consumes Run 3 outputs, produces: - ImageCellDisplay, ImageCellEditor (atoms/grid/image/) - ImageUploadDialog organism - item-grid-columns update - Barrel exports in canary.tsRisk Analysis
Section titled “Risk Analysis”Splitting mitigates:
- Context window exhaustion from tracking 19 component specs simultaneously
- Cascading failures from Wave 0b structural changes (file moves, import paths)
- Difficulty diagnosing build failures across unrelated component groups
Coordination overhead:
- Low — all runs target the same repository on a single feature branch
- Hand-offs are filesystem-only (committed code from prior run)
- Single worktree for all runs (sequential execution)
Worktree Strategy
Section titled “Worktree Strategy”- Parent branch:
main(up-to-date withoriginbefore branching) - Base branch:
jmpicnic/item-image-upload-components(created offmain) - Worktrees: One per run when parallelism within a run risks update conflicts. Runs with fully independent tasks (e.g., Run 2 with 5 leaf components) may use multiple worktrees. All worktrees merge back to the base branch at the end of each wave.
Worktree naming
Section titled “Worktree naming”image-components-worktrees/<run-or-task>Examples:
image-components-worktrees/run-1— single worktree for sequential Run 1image-components-worktrees/run-2-display— parallel agent in Run 2image-components-worktrees/run-2-dropzone— parallel agent in Run 2
Branch naming for parallel agents
Section titled “Branch naming for parallel agents”Each parallel worktree gets its own branch off the base branch:
jmpicnic/item-image-upload-components/<task> (e.g.,
jmpicnic/item-image-upload-components/image-display).
At the end of the wave, each task branch is merged into the base branch
jmpicnic/item-image-upload-components, conflicts resolved, and the gate
validated.
Cleanup
Section titled “Cleanup”Worktrees removed after each wave gate passes. Parent worktree directory removed after final PR is merged.
Open Questions and Decisions
Section titled “Open Questions and Decisions”| # | Question | Options | Recommendation | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Should Runs 2 and 3 use parallel agents within each run? | (a) Sequential single agent, (b) 2-3 parallel agents per run | (b) Parallel within Run 2 (8 components are leaf-level and independent) | Pending |
Copyright: (c) Arda Systems 2025-2026, All rights reserved
Copyright: © Arda Systems 2025-2026, All rights reserved