Team Split Assessment
Plan Under Review
Section titled “Plan Under Review”- Project: AWS Infrastructure for Item Image Upload
- Specification: specification.md
- Date: 2026-03-30
Complexity Analysis
Section titled “Complexity Analysis”| Factor | Value | Threshold | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total file changes | 20 | 15 | Over |
| Sequential phases with dependencies | 2 (Phase 0 → Phase 1) | 2 | At threshold |
| Distinct persona types needed | 2 (devops-engineer, quality-reviewer) | 4 | Under |
| Working directories | 1 (infrastructure repo) | 1 | At threshold |
| Cross-cutting concerns | 2 (root account deploy, CI integration) | 1 | Over |
| Tasks with external validation | 5 (cdk synth, deploy-root, amm.sh, verify-image-cdn, npm test) | 5 | At threshold |
Qualitative factors:
- Natural phase boundary: Phase 0 (DNS) must be deployed and verified before Phase 1 (partition resources) can use the assets hosted zone and certificate. This is a hard deployment gate — not just a code dependency.
- Error blast radius: A root account deployment error affects all infrastructures; isolating it in its own run limits blast radius.
- Context window: The two phases use different stack files, different deployment commands, and different verification methods. Separating them keeps each run focused.
Recommendation
Section titled “Recommendation”Split into 2 runs. The deployment gate between Phase 0 (root + infra DNS) and Phase 1 (partition CDK constructs) is a natural boundary. Run 1 modifies shared global infrastructure (root account, infrastructure stacks); Run 2 creates new partition-scoped constructs and tests. Separating them limits the blast radius of root account changes and enables independent validation.
Proposed Runs
Section titled “Proposed Runs”| Run | Directory | Description | Files | Personas | Est. Tasks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | run-1-dns-foundation/ | Phase 0: Root zone, infra subdomain zone + cert, deploy-root.sh, ci-root-check.js, ari-configuration | 6 modified/new | devops-engineer | 8 |
| 2 | run-2-partition-resources/ | Phase 1: CDK constructs, stacks, partition wiring, tests, CI, verification script, multi-env deployment | 16 modified/new | devops-engineer, quality-reviewer | 23 |
Artifact Flow
Section titled “Artifact Flow”Run 1 produces: - assets.arda.cards hosted zone (deployed to root account) - <infra>.assets.arda.cards subdomain zone + ACM cert (deployed to infra account) - deploy-root.sh script - ASSETS_DOMAIN constant + assetsDomain() function in ari-configuration.ts - Updated ImportingStack with assetsHostedZone + assetsCertificateArn
Run 2 consumes: - assetsHostedZone and assetsCertificateArn from ImportingStack (available via cross-stack imports after Run 1 deployment) - assetsDomain() for CDN custom domain constructionRun 2 cannot start implementation until Run 1 is deployed (not just coded) — the hosted zone and certificate must exist in AWS for the CDN construct to create DNS records and use the certificate.
However, Run 2 can start coding constructs and tests against LocalStack or mocked values before Run 1 is deployed. The deployment gate applies only to integration testing and the verification script.
Risk Analysis
Section titled “Risk Analysis”| Risk | Mitigation via Split |
|---|---|
| Root account deployment failure blocks all work | Run 1 is small (5 files); failure is diagnosed quickly before Run 2 begins |
| ACM certificate DNS validation fails (slow propagation) | Isolated in Run 1; Run 2 doesn’t wait for cert issuance to start coding |
| New constructs break existing stacks | Run 2’s snapshot tests and ci-check catch regressions before deployment |
| Root account has no CI automation | Run 1 includes deploy-root.sh; manual execution is acceptable for a one-time setup |
Coordination overhead is minimal: one handoff between runs, verified by a deployment gate (not a code review gate).
Open Questions and Decisions
Section titled “Open Questions and Decisions”| # | Question | Options | Recommendation | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Should Run 2 start coding before Run 1 is deployed? | (a) Wait for full deployment, (b) Start coding against mocked imports | (b) — constructs can be developed and unit-tested independently; only integration testing needs live infrastructure | Pending |
| 2 | Worktree strategy | (a) Single worktree per run, (b) Shared worktree | (a) — each run gets its own branch for clean PRs | Pending |
Copyright: (c) Arda Systems 2025-2026, All rights reserved
Copyright: © Arda Systems 2025-2026, All rights reserved