Team Split Assessment: Arda API Proxy
Plan Under Review
Section titled “Plan Under Review”- File: Specification § Implementation Phases
- Date: 2026-03-31
Complexity Analysis
Section titled “Complexity Analysis”| Factor | Value | Threshold | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total tasks | 18 | 15 | Over |
| Distinct phases with sequential dependencies | 4 | 2 | Over |
| Distinct persona types needed | 1 (TypeScript engineer) | 4 | Under |
| Estimated working directories | 1 (api-proxy worktree) | 1 | Under |
| Cross-cutting concerns (handoffs, gates) | 1 (type derivation from OpenAPI) | 1 | Under |
| Tasks with external validation (builds, tests) | 4 (npm install, typecheck, lint, test) | 5 | Under |
Qualitative Factors
Section titled “Qualitative Factors”- Context window pressure: Low — single repo, repetitive proxy pattern. Each proxy follows the same template, so context from earlier proxies directly informs later ones.
- Error blast radius: Moderate — if shared infra (
HttpClient, types, errors) is wrong, all proxies are wrong. Isolating the foundation into Run 1 limits blast radius. - Natural phase boundaries: Clear checkpoint after Phase 1 — once shared infra + tenant reference + CI are validated end-to-end, the remaining proxies are mechanical.
Recommendation
Section titled “Recommendation”Split into 2 runs — The project has a natural boundary between establishing the pattern (shared infra, reference proxy, CI) and replicating the pattern (remaining 7 proxies). Splitting here:
- Validates the entire toolchain (build, test, lint, coverage) before investing in the repetitive work.
- Limits blast radius — if the shared infra design is wrong, only Run 1 is affected.
- Keeps each run within a manageable context window.
Proposed Runs
Section titled “Proposed Runs”| Run | Directory | Description | Tasks | Personas | Est. Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | run-1-foundation/ | Repo scaffolding, shared utilities, TenantProxy (reference), CI/CD, spec path corrections | 10 | back-end-engineer | Medium |
| 2 | run-2-proxies-and-publish/ | Remaining 7 proxies + types + tests, barrel exports, README, CHANGELOG | 12 | back-end-engineer | Medium-Large |
Artifact Flow
Section titled “Artifact Flow”Run 1 produces:
- Initialized
api-proxyrepository with working build toolchain src/shared/— HttpClient, types, errors (the foundation all proxies depend on)src/system/tenant.ts+tenant.types.ts— reference implementation proving the patterntests/shared/+tests/system/tenant.test.ts— test patterns for subsequent proxies.github/workflows/ci.yml+publish.yml— CI/CD pipeline- Green CI:
npm run format:check && npm run typecheck && npm run lint && npm run test:coverage && npm run build
Run 2 consumes:
- The entire Run 1 output as its starting point
- The established proxy pattern (tenant as template) for the remaining 7 proxies
Run 2 produces:
- Complete package with all 8 proxies, full barrel exports, README, CHANGELOG
- Package ready for PR and publish
Risk Analysis
Section titled “Risk Analysis”Splitting mitigates:
- Foundation defects propagating into 7 proxy implementations before being caught
- Wasted work if the HttpClient API or type conventions need revision after tenant validation
- Context window exhaustion from a single long session
Coordination overhead is minimal:
- Single agent, sequential runs — no merge conflicts or parallel coordination
- Hand-off is filesystem-only (the worktree state after Run 1 is Run 2’s input)
- Single repository — no cross-repo dependencies
Open Questions and Decisions
Section titled “Open Questions and Decisions”| # | Question | Options | Recommendation | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No open questions — all decisions resolved in Decision Log |
Copyright: © Arda Systems 2025-2026, All rights reserved