Template: Implementation Plan [Project Name]
Author: Principal Engineer Date: YYYY-MM-DD Status: Draft | In Review | Approved Related Issue: [GitHub Issue link]
Summary
Section titled “Summary”One-paragraph description of what this plan covers and why the change is needed.
Context
Section titled “Context”- Link to the originating Product Owner feature description or user story.
- Link to the Domain Architect model if new entities or relationships are involved.
- Any relevant prior art, spikes, or architecture decision records.
In Scope
Section titled “In Scope”- List of specific changes this plan covers.
Out of Scope
Section titled “Out of Scope”- Explicitly list what this plan does not cover, to prevent scope creep.
Design
Section titled “Design”Describe the technical approach at a level sufficient for the Back End Engineer or Front End Engineer to implement without making architectural decisions.
Persistence Changes
Section titled “Persistence Changes”- New tables, columns, Flyway migration scripts.
- Changes to Exposed table definitions.
Service Layer Changes
Section titled “Service Layer Changes”- New or modified
DataAuthorityServiceimplementations. - Observer registrations, cascade behavior, validation rules.
API Changes
Section titled “API Changes”- New or modified endpoints (method, path, request/response shapes).
- Changes to
DataAuthorityEndpointorServiceEndpointDslusage.
Frontend Changes
Section titled “Frontend Changes”- New pages, components, or layouts.
- State management, data fetching, and mock handler changes.
Task Breakdown
Section titled “Task Breakdown”| # | Task | Persona | Depends On | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create Flyway migration | Back End Engineer | — | Migration applies cleanly |
| 2 | Add Exposed table definition | Back End Engineer | 1 | Compiles; maps to new schema |
| 3 | Implement service logic | Back End Engineer | 2 | Unit tests pass |
| 4 | Add API endpoint | Back End Engineer | 3 | Endpoint responds correctly |
| 5 | Implement frontend page | Front End Engineer | 4 | Page renders; calls API |
| 6 | Write acceptance tests | Acceptance Test Engineer | 4, 5 | Bruno API tests pass |
Worktree Strategy
Section titled “Worktree Strategy”When the task breakdown has 2+ parallel agents modifying the same repository, each agent should work in its own git worktree for physical directory isolation. If worktrees are not needed (single agent, or tasks target different repositories), replace this section with: “Single directory — no worktrees needed.”
Base branch: <branch-name>
Worktree layout (at workspace root):
| Worktree directory | Branch | Agent | Task |
|---|---|---|---|
${projectName}-worktrees/${taskName} | ${githubUsername}/${projectName}/${taskName} | [agent name] | # |
Merge workflow: [Describe how branches integrate before final validation.]
Agent absolute-path rule: Agents in worktrees MUST use absolute paths for all tool calls and prefix Bash commands with cd <worktree-absolute-path> &&.
Risks and Mitigations
Section titled “Risks and Mitigations”| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration conflicts with concurrent work | Low | High | Coordinate migration version numbers via Team Lead |
Open Questions and Decisions
Section titled “Open Questions and Decisions”| # | Question | Options | Recommendation | Decision |
|---|
Copyright: © Arda Systems 2025-2026, All rights reserved